Newton Aldermen Debate Special Permit, Size of Proposed Nevada Street Home

The two-family dwelling would exceed the property's floor-area ratio limit, and several aldermen believe it is too big for the neighborhood.

For the second time this summer, the Newton Board of Aldermen delayed a decision on a home construction project after members shared concerns over the size of the proposed residence.

During last night's full Board of Aldermen meeting, the board discussed a special permit for a proposed two-family home at 258 Nevada St. The permit, which the board will reconsider on September 4, would allow the proposed residence to exceed the designated floor-area ratio (FAR) for the property. 

"This is my neighborhood. It's a neighborhood in transition but the majority of the houses are not this big," said Ward 2 Alderman-at-Large Marcia Johnson. "The size of this building is mind boggling to me."

The FAR regulations, which control the ratio between a home’s floor space to its lot size, . The restrictions aim to prevent construction of oversized homes (often called "McMansions").

Earlier this summer, in Newton Centre that exceeded the lot's FAR. Many aldermen, including Land Use Committee Chair Ted Hess-Mahan, believed the home was too large for the neighborhood.

After delaying the vote, .

According to Hess-Mahan, the project at 258 Nevada St. involves expanding an existing 19th century home to create a two-family dwelling. 

The addition would mirror the current home, Hess-Mahan said, and would push the FAR from .31 to .57, where a FAR of .48 is what is allowed on the lot. 

The site plan involves a several curb cuts to accommodate multiple driveways, including a couple of underground garages.

The Land Use Committee approved the special permit for the home on August 7 with a vote of 4-1. Ward 5 Alderman-at-Large Deb Crossley was the single dissenting vote. 

Crossley, who continued her argument against the permit last night, noted that the special permit for the Nevada Street home is the largest FAR increase request the board has received since adjusting the limits last year.

The site design, Crossley argued, could be adjusted to better fit the lot and the neighborhood.

"This is going in the direction that is opposite from all other areas in the city," said Ward 5 Alderman-at-Large Deb Crossley. "I think it's possible to do better on this site."

Ward 2 Alderman-at-Large Susan Albright also disagreed with the permit. While the proposed home may be similar in size to others on the street, Albright noted that the Planning Department said those other large homes would likely exceed the new FAR requirements for their lots.

After a suggestion from Ward 1 Alderman-at-Large Jay Ciccone, the aldermen unanimously voted to postpone the item. The board will continue the discussion and vote on the permit at its next meeting on September 4. 

Dino Rossi September 11, 2012 at 01:59 AM
I believe the consideration of restoring and preserving the current home is a wonderful thing. Not all builders are willing to preserve homes and most times tear the homes down as it is far easier starting from scratch. Other abutting homes are simialr in size. The project received aproximately 16 letters from abutter in favor of the proposal and zero objection from the neighborhood. If this proposal was not approved the home would have been torn down and a longer narrower home would have taken its place and the new home would have appeared bigger that the proposed home because of set backs etc.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »